Reading Strategies PowerPoint
This PowerPoint included reading strategies that I will be using from now on! I already utilize a majority of these strategies such as the think alouds during my reading/writing lessons as well as the KWL charts throughout my science and social studies lessons. Additionally, I have my students complete anticipation guides or textbook activity guides during social studies and science lessons. I always want to build on my students’ prior knowledge so they have a strong foundation to support the new knowledge. I use the 3-2-1 strategy in the form of a pyramid or column notes when my students watch an educational video. Although I rarely use RAFTs, I customarily use them during social studies where my students accept a role as a historian or the person we are currently study. I love using graphic organizers, especially spider webs/maps because the majority of my students are visual learners. We often use Kidspiration where the students build their own maps using the computer software. Also, I built my very first word wall this year because of all the readings in this class. This PowerPoint had some great pointers that I will include within my word wall this year and years to follow. I agree that the word wall should be in an obvious spot where the students can easily see it. My students often go up to our word wall throughout the school day. I include vocabulary from all academic areas on this word wall. I make up the word on Microsoft Word and try to include a picture whenever applicable. The only problem I have run into is that I am already running out of room under common letters. I wish I had a much bigger wall! I like the idea of guessing the word which would help build identification of the word and students would also practice the spelling of the words. I think I will use WORDO before the CRCT this year and I will call out the definition instead of the word itself to make it more challenging. Overall, this was a great PowerPoint to refresh my memory about all the wonderful reading strategies that are available. I agree that an effective teacher should teach and model the strategy and then supervise the children so that all students can succeed with the specific strategy.
Differentiated Instruction Goals PowerPoint
This auditory PowerPoint discussed differentiated instruction goals for a teacher. I agree that differentiated instructions help meet the learning needs of all students. I continuously engage my students in all curriculum areas. I believe it is important for all students to be engaged throughout their school day. I let the students choose their individual reading book because I feel that it is important for the students to be interested in the topic and feel a sense of ownership. I engage my students by designing opportunities that enhance their creativity and challenge their individual needs. I provide appropriate scaffolding throughout my lessons so I can watch my students prosper. I make sure that I provide opportunities for students to work in varied instructional formats. Currently, my students are working on writing a fictional story in my classroom. Yet, in the computer lab, they are currently working on their own podcasts. In conclusion, I agree that one major goal for differentiated instruction is to establish learner-responsive, teacher-facilitated classrooms.
Considerations for Assessment PowerPoint
This PowerPoint was very helpful because it offered information on assessments that I am not familiar with. I have never been a fan of standardized assessments because I tend to “psyche” myself out and end up making lower test scores than I ever thought possible. I am not familiar with intelligence tests nor have I ever seen the results for anybody’s test. However, I would tend to agree that low test scores cause students to have low expectations. I believe in self-fulfilling prophecies such as where a student believes they are a horrible mathematician and eventually it comes true because that is what they are always thinking about and believing. However, one can have a positive self-fulfilling prophecy (e.g., a student believes that they are the best speller ever and that child will strive to be the best speller he/she can be). I also have never heard of the Wechsler Scales. It seems like poor readers do not score well on the arithmetic, digit span, information, and coding assessments. However, they receive higher scores on non-verbal and visual aspects. I feel that these assessments are used for testing students who are labeled as “struggling students”. Some of these assessments sound similar to the ones that I hear about during my RTI or IEP meetings. I think I would better understand these assessments if I was able to see an example of the questions.